1hander wrote:first id like to say ...wowww... this is a really great screenset/plugin im not sure what to call it... at first i will admit i was very intimidated by it and the manual....
but i decided to RTFM lol/// i read it and reread it and reread it... and very quickly things started to make sense... after only a couple hours of reading and poking around i had it pretty much figured out ...at least enough not to destroy anything..
very well thought out...the auto tlo stuff is freakin awesome...i cant tell you how easy this makes things for a disabled vet with one working arm... thank you thank you...
I don't have much to offer here - hopefully it was a one time glitch. One thought that comes to mind: if mach is told the machine is referenced, but the MC Z points are not were they normally are, then this shifts the entire work space physically.. and then things can get into trouble.1hander wrote: i read throught the forum posts and found the tlo update script and added that and it was super easy and works perfectly...although im still waiting for my tool setter i could play with things on the mill with the probe at least..
only prob i had and im not sure what happened...i hit goto tool change positionand instead of going up and to the tool change position (very top of Z) it went down into the work piece and smashed my new stylus ... after that i tried and tried to recreate the crash and every after that it reacted correctly by going to the tool change position and waiting .... never got it to go down (crash) again...very strange.. ill be doing more testing but removing the workpiece just in case... probly something i did wrong though
Yea this is possible- in fact it's why I added the hook to call a script just before the ATLO routine is run.1hander wrote: the manual has a small paragraph about an airblast to clear chips before a tool measure operation... can you point me in the right direction to getting this done...or is it possible to add a button where you could enable or disable the airblast feature during tool measuring.. i dont know about writing scripts so i dont know how difficult this would be.. please excuse my ignorance in the matter... then the end user could add a solenoid to a spare output and run a Y from the mist line to that solenoid.. i have spare solenoids on the spindle control card that are not being used because im using a plugin for the huanyang vfd..so the only solenoid being used is for coolant.... im not even sure if what im thinking will work
rick
Code: Select all
ActivateSignal(output3)
sleep 250
DeactivateSignal(output3)
exit sub
Mach script files are just plain ascii text files with a .m1s extension. They can be edited with notepad (or any other simple text editor. do no edit with word as that will put non-ascii (binary) chars in the file).1hander wrote:thanks dave
i figured the info was there but i just missed it....
can you tell me what i need to install to be able to read/modify the template, im getting a please install apple appliction support when i try to open the template..
to get started, go get the template file (M6PreAutoTLO_Template.m1s) and copy it to c:/mach3/macros/<whatever your profile name is>1hander wrote: the profile im using is called of course mymachstandardmill.. is this where your saying i need to add
i found i think my profile in................. mach3/macros/mymachstandardmill ......... is that the right one...
again im sorry... im just poking around in the trial version on my laptop and im freaking terrified of screwing it up... im literally groping in the dark... but im willing to try...im ashamed to say ill require a bit more 1handed hand holding ...
doing the preautotlo maintenance thing was much easier because it literally just required i read and do exactly what i read... im x military what can i say LOL
If the tool setter is one of the types that moves, then you should read this thread before getting to far down that path:1hander wrote: i am excited tho...the tool setter and height gage should be hear any day now... im using the height gage to get an really good .0001 measurement of the probe at the momemt of activation, i know its overkill but i try to introduce as little error as i can with numbers... cuz numbers never lie or screw up...only i do
rick .
that will work - but can be improved a bit...1hander wrote: how wrong is this
![]()
to see that the pin is actually toggling, you need to look at the physical pin.... and that means some way to see the voltage change on the output pin. The solenoid will indicate that or you can hook a volt meter to the pin.1hander wrote: A. other actually hooking up and hearing the solenoid clicking on the output... is there a way i can visually see the output being triggered (LED maybe)during the measuring....or will i need to set up the solenoid etc..
correct1hander wrote: yes i read that thread...and was thinking the following
i wanted a moving type so it would be easier to interface the two signals on one input...easier for me with little experience with this kinda stuff... i was planning on measuring the tool probe offline with a height gage ...it came in and is good for .0001 ... im hoping thats good enough... ....then entering the PTL manually (using the meaurement when the probe is triggered)...
3.. could i not use the same procedure for the moving touchplate then enter that height for the GAGE/PLATE HEIGHT thickness... im assuming the DRO for that is the GAGE/PLATE HEIGHT ...
a. in order for that height to be effecive do i have to have TLO G-BLK IS TP activated...
the exact steps needed depend on what TLO technique you are using. i suggest that you play around a bit and see how well that works for you.1hander wrote: 4. how bout if ... for the spring type tool setters... we could do like the calibration procedure for the touch probe..... but instead input the actual height of the tool setter then use the nose of the spindle without a tool in it to calibrate the effective height just like the probe ...
I used a piece of blank printed circuit board (copper on two side separted by fiberglass). It's generally easy ton find and flat to start with.1hander wrote: for the fixed touchplate...
1. can i assume i would just make it out of copper ....
When using the "two signal" method, you can only see one of the two signals (generally the probe signal) on the Probe LEDs on the MSM pages. This is because the other signal (touch plate) is only connected dynamically when it is actualy being used. This can make debugging a bit harder, but other than that the two signal approach works fine.1hander wrote:2. is there any disadvantage other than having to use another input pin , when doing the two input approach as opposed to the single input.
The software does not care how large the touch plate is - it';s just one contact of a big switch where the tool is the other half.1hander wrote: 3. if i do a fixed touchplate, i want to be able to touchoff my facemill, its 50mm in diameter, is there any problem with making the touchplate that big.. the problem is that i didt buy a super expensive facemill, and i know now that the apmt inserts dont all sit in the facemill at exactly the same height so i would need for the facemill to come down cemtered on the touchplate because i dont know which insert will hit the plate first... it may be the quality of the insert thats the problem... idk... tolerance or something