MTM TLO's with Gaugeline TLO's
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:34 am
Dave,
I Use the Master Tool mode with all repeatable holders, even drill bits, and I have been frustrated from time to time if there is a glitch and the probe tip gets damaged from either not stopping while probing Z or some other goofy mishap like user error in handling or dropping the probe.. this becomes an ordeal and a lot of wasted time in resetting all of the TLO's for the new master tool PTL.
Is there a better method to use traditional TLO measurements off of the gauge line and have them be calculated automatically based on the new MT PTL? this would save a lot of time and aggravation as I now have almost 50 RH tools that require remeasuring when something wonky happens and I have to change a tip on the Probe Tool or if I need to use a different length Tip for a special job. I am sure you can imagine, it ALWAYS happens at an inopportune time. By using TLO's with the Gauge Line, the TLO's would still be correctly measured regardless of what happens to the MT. and if the Calculation could be done so the MT PTL WHen Measured is then used to determine the new MTM TLO for using the probe as the Master Tool.
Does this make sense to you? It does to me given the inevitability of probing issues that occur randomly. It would also mean that there would only be one method required to enter Tool length offsets in the software. it would also mean I **think** that you could use the same method to determine the Probe Tool Physical Tool Length as it would be measured and recorded the same as the other tools off the gauge line. I do potentially see there could be a complication if you couldn't measure the spindle nose because of limited travel, but then you could use the block gauge method couldn't you? on my machine I can lower the spindle nose enough to tough my touch plate so it wouldn't be an issue.
this would also mean that any tools measure on the bench would be accurate as well for use in MTM. Just thinking out loud as I remeasure 50 tools after a probe tip replacement.
Chris
I Use the Master Tool mode with all repeatable holders, even drill bits, and I have been frustrated from time to time if there is a glitch and the probe tip gets damaged from either not stopping while probing Z or some other goofy mishap like user error in handling or dropping the probe.. this becomes an ordeal and a lot of wasted time in resetting all of the TLO's for the new master tool PTL.
Is there a better method to use traditional TLO measurements off of the gauge line and have them be calculated automatically based on the new MT PTL? this would save a lot of time and aggravation as I now have almost 50 RH tools that require remeasuring when something wonky happens and I have to change a tip on the Probe Tool or if I need to use a different length Tip for a special job. I am sure you can imagine, it ALWAYS happens at an inopportune time. By using TLO's with the Gauge Line, the TLO's would still be correctly measured regardless of what happens to the MT. and if the Calculation could be done so the MT PTL WHen Measured is then used to determine the new MTM TLO for using the probe as the Master Tool.
Does this make sense to you? It does to me given the inevitability of probing issues that occur randomly. It would also mean that there would only be one method required to enter Tool length offsets in the software. it would also mean I **think** that you could use the same method to determine the Probe Tool Physical Tool Length as it would be measured and recorded the same as the other tools off the gauge line. I do potentially see there could be a complication if you couldn't measure the spindle nose because of limited travel, but then you could use the block gauge method couldn't you? on my machine I can lower the spindle nose enough to tough my touch plate so it wouldn't be an issue.
this would also mean that any tools measure on the bench would be accurate as well for use in MTM. Just thinking out loud as I remeasure 50 tools after a probe tip replacement.

Chris